<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Teaching Naked &#8211; &#8216;First, We Kill All the PowerPoint&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hg2s.com/blog/2009/08/26/teaching-naked-first-we-kill-all-the-powerpoint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hg2s.com/blog/2009/08/26/teaching-naked-first-we-kill-all-the-powerpoint/</link>
	<description>Ranting &#38; Raving on Instructional Design, Education &#38; Technical Training</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:16:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack McShea</title>
		<link>http://www.hg2s.com/blog/2009/08/26/teaching-naked-first-we-kill-all-the-powerpoint/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack McShea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hg2s.com/blog/?p=831#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an interesting twist on presentations at Microsoft: Steve Balmer suggesting an &quot;inverted&quot; (as in the inverted classroom) methodology using techniques previously advocated by Edward Tufte:

 	
Microsoft&#039;s CEO wants ET method of presentation, not PowerPoint

From an interview of Steven A. Ballmer, chief executive of Microsoft, in The New York Times, May 16, 2009:

Q. What&#039;s it like to be in a meeting run by Steve Ballmer?

A. &quot;I&#039;ve changed that, really in the last couple years. The mode of Microsoft meetings used to be: You come with something we haven&#039;t seen in a slide deck or presentation. You deliver the presentation. You probably take what I will call &quot;the long and winding road.&quot; You take the listener through your path of discovery and exploration, and you arrive at a conclusion.&quot;

&quot;That&#039;s kind of the way I used to like to do it, and the way Bill [Gates] used to kind of like to do it. And it seemed like the best way to do it, because if you went to the conclusion first, you&#039;d get: &quot;What about this? Have you thought about this?&quot; So people naturally tried to tell you all the things that supported the decision, and then tell you the decision.&quot;

&quot;I decided that&#039;s not what I want to do anymore. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s productive. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s efficient. I get impatient. So most meetings nowadays, you send me the materials and I read them in advance. And I can come in and say: &quot;I&#039;ve got the following four questions. Please don&#039;t present the deck.&quot; That lets us go, whether they&#039;ve organized it that way or not, to the recommendation. And if I have questions about the long and winding road and the data and the supporting evidence, I can ask them. But it gives us greater focus.&quot;

-- Edward Tufte, May 18, 2009

http://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0003RO&amp;topic_id=1

One can only hope that the materials sent out before the meeting are not PowerPoint stacks crammed full of text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting twist on presentations at Microsoft: Steve Balmer suggesting an &#8220;inverted&#8221; (as in the inverted classroom) methodology using techniques previously advocated by Edward Tufte:</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s CEO wants ET method of presentation, not PowerPoint</p>
<p>From an interview of Steven A. Ballmer, chief executive of Microsoft, in The New York Times, May 16, 2009:</p>
<p>Q. What&#8217;s it like to be in a meeting run by Steve Ballmer?</p>
<p>A. &#8220;I&#8217;ve changed that, really in the last couple years. The mode of Microsoft meetings used to be: You come with something we haven&#8217;t seen in a slide deck or presentation. You deliver the presentation. You probably take what I will call &#8220;the long and winding road.&#8221; You take the listener through your path of discovery and exploration, and you arrive at a conclusion.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s kind of the way I used to like to do it, and the way Bill [Gates] used to kind of like to do it. And it seemed like the best way to do it, because if you went to the conclusion first, you&#8217;d get: &#8220;What about this? Have you thought about this?&#8221; So people naturally tried to tell you all the things that supported the decision, and then tell you the decision.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I decided that&#8217;s not what I want to do anymore. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s productive. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s efficient. I get impatient. So most meetings nowadays, you send me the materials and I read them in advance. And I can come in and say: &#8220;I&#8217;ve got the following four questions. Please don&#8217;t present the deck.&#8221; That lets us go, whether they&#8217;ve organized it that way or not, to the recommendation. And if I have questions about the long and winding road and the data and the supporting evidence, I can ask them. But it gives us greater focus.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; Edward Tufte, May 18, 2009</p>
<p><a href="http://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0003RO&amp;topic_id=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0003RO&amp;topic_id=1</a></p>
<p>One can only hope that the materials sent out before the meeting are not PowerPoint stacks crammed full of text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
