<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Think of it as Data Compression &#8211; Texting OK for Learning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hg2s.com/blog/2010/01/20/think-of-it-as-data-compression-texting-ok-for-learning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hg2s.com/blog/2010/01/20/think-of-it-as-data-compression-texting-ok-for-learning/</link>
	<description>Ranting &#38; Raving on Instructional Design, Education &#38; Technical Training</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:39:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack McShea</title>
		<link>http://www.hg2s.com/blog/2010/01/20/think-of-it-as-data-compression-texting-ok-for-learning/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack McShea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hg2s.com/blog/?p=998#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Mike Masnick at TechDirt has been following the Texting-Literacy Debate for the past five years and has posted a summary of no less than six prior studies that corroborate Dr Wood’s findings that texting does not harm literacy skills. Masnick cites: 

University of Toronto &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news.utoronto.ca/bin6/060731-2474.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;study&lt;/a&gt;

“&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/17-09/st_thompson&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Clive Thompson on the New Literacy&lt;/a&gt;” in Wired Magazine

“&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126965.300-texting-can-b-gd-4-ur-kids.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Texting can b gd 4 ur kids&lt;/a&gt;”  in NewScientist

among the supporting examples. His summary article is well worth the read. 

http://techdirt.com/articles/20100120/2326407852.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Masnick at TechDirt has been following the Texting-Literacy Debate for the past five years and has posted a summary of no less than six prior studies that corroborate Dr Wood’s findings that texting does not harm literacy skills. Masnick cites: </p>
<p>University of Toronto <a href="http://www.news.utoronto.ca/bin6/060731-2474.asp" rel="nofollow">study</a></p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/17-09/st_thompson" rel="nofollow">Clive Thompson on the New Literacy</a>” in Wired Magazine</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126965.300-texting-can-b-gd-4-ur-kids.html" rel="nofollow">Texting can b gd 4 ur kids</a>”  in NewScientist</p>
<p>among the supporting examples. His summary article is well worth the read. </p>
<p><a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20100120/2326407852.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://techdirt.com/articles/20100120/2326407852.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

